BECTU logo

Feedback 
Links 
Magazine 
Policy 
Who's who? 

BBC reorganisation
No agreement on conditions or redundancies - union to ballot for action.
19.10.00

At the final meeting between London Operations management and BECTU and AEEU representatives, the unions registered a failure to agree on proposals for job cuts and changes in conditions of service.

Over the course of six previous directorate level meetings, the number of compulsory redundancies had been gradually reduced from a potential 260 to less than two dozen, some of whom could expect to secure new posts as part of a management and administration reorganisation.

Early in the discussions the unions had warned of major problems with plans to scrap the 10s/12s agreements in Studios and OBs, and the redefinition of base area as anywhere within 25 miles of TV Centre.

Notwithstanding these reservations, the unions had been willing to discuss a draft conditions of service document produced by management, and were due at the meeting to respond in detail to the proposals.

The meeting also dealt with the redundancy situation, and a major upset occurred when management announced that everyone in Studio Management would, after all, be made redundant, rather than transferring to production departments as had been hoped.

REDUNDANCY TRAWL

  • OB Cameras
    Management reported that two volunteers had withdrawn their applications for voluntary redundancies, however it was hoped that more staff would transfer onto BBC First contracts, and there was still no need for compulsory redundancies in the section.

  • Radio OBs
    Two new volunteers had been found, one a fresh application, and the other a volunteer who had previously been rejected, but was now to be allowed to leave. Management warned that this meant they would be selecting three staff in the section for compulsory redundancy.

    BECTU asked if opportunities were on offer for transfers to BBC First, which might alleviate the redundancy problem, and management said they would consider this and respond.

  • Allocations
    The earlier withdrawal of two volunteers had increased the possibility that some staff might be made compulsorily redundant in this area, but management wanted to commence boarding for new posts, and would assess the situation once this had been done.

    Team Leader interviews would be held first, followed by boards for the remaining Allocator positions. Any current staff who did not secure positions would then be able to seek redeployment elsewhere in the department. Any who accepted posts at a lower grade would keep their current salary on a standstill basis.

  • Manchester
    Plans to close the OB base had not been altered during local talks, and the union had focused on resettlement for the 11 staff affected. One person had secured an attachment away from the department, but none had responded to a management offer of relocation in London. Management said that efforts had been made to find resettlement opportunities in BBC North, without success.

    Staff were now facing compulsory redundancy, with notice likely to be issued at the end of October.

  • Studio Management
    Discussions with production departments, who at one time were hoping to take over the entire department, had failed, said management, and all staff would now be served with redundancy notices at the end of October.

    London Operations had been prepared to underwrite the redundancy costs of the staff for a year, had they been transferred to production, but despite this added incentive, no production area felt it could take on the burden of a section which, apparently, could not cover its ongoing costs.

    The union expressed shock at the announcement, and pointed out that there had been no detailed discussion of the economic decision to close the section since everyone, including London Ops management, had been hoping for a successful transfer to production.

    Management agreed to provide financial data and utilisation statistics so that the union could consider counter-arguments to the department's closure.

STUDIO ENGINEERING

  • Paperwork supplied by management had detailed the transfer of three engineers from Studio Engineering; 2 to Technical Services and 1 to Kendal Avenue maintenance, with the consequential closure of Sound & Vision Test Room.

    Management originally suggested that they would move the three staff currently in Sound & Vision, but after internal management consultation had decided to select three staff from the overall pool of TV Centre engineers.

    Union reps once again pointed out the pitfalls of the closure, and predicted that the move would simply put more strain on other maintenance areas which were already overworked.

    The union also queried the proposed move from UPA1 to UPA2 for Studio Engineering staff.

CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
The unions tabled a detailed counter-proposal which had been drafted after consultation with members and branches affected.

  • 10s/12s Agreements
    In response to the management's proposal to scrap these, the unions proposed that:
    • A list of staff willing to be scheduled more than 12 hours, or accept breaks of less than 10, should be set up.
    • Working longer than 14 hours should always be voluntary.
    • Reward should be accrued at the rate of 0.5T per hour from 12 to 14 hours, and 1T beyond 14. Infringements of the 10 hour break should attract reward of 1T per hour. Staff should be able to take the reward either as COMP-style leave, or as cash. Management were asked to consider an OB-type arrangement under which the leave would be worth more in time off during quiet periods.

    Management had indicated at an earlier meeting that they might be willing to introduce some payment for days over 13 hours, and suggested two alternatives:

    • A 0.5T per hour payment for hours over 13, and hours worked into an 11 hour break,
      OR:
    • A 1T payment for hours over 13, with no payment for infringed breaks.

    The union said that the change from 12 to 13 hours as the definition of a long day was unacceptable, and neither of the management's alternative payment systems would satisfy members.

    When asked to offer an opinion about their relative merits, reps suggested that 1T beyond 13 hours was probably better than the 0.5T option.

  • WOODs payments
    The union rejected a proposal to change the requirement for four days of 12 or more hours before a week could earn a WOODs payment to 13 hours or more. Management were also asked to stick to the existing schedule of payments, with three bands of payment depending on length of day, with single payments for any length of day.

  • Base area
    A proposal to define base area as anywhere within 15 miles of Television Centre or Manchester BH was rejected by the union. The management's original proposal had been a 25 mile radius, and the 15 mile proposal represented a concession. However, staff working on OBs, at Elstree, or in the West End, stood to lose significant amounts in travel time and other payments, said union reps.

    Feelings about the issue had been heightened by the separate, cross-BBC, announcement that lunch allowances were to be scrapped from January, and evening meal allowances were to be restricted to staff on detached duty, or those working more than 12 hours.

  • Leave
    The union suggested that acceptance/refusal of leave should be confirmed in writing, and that sickness absence on a public holiday should be credited at:
    • 8 hours for UPA2 staff
    • Scheduled hours for UPA0/UPA1 staff.

    Management rejected the proposal for crediting of sickness absence on public holidays.

  • Scheduling
    After much discussion and several re-drafts over previous weeks, the union side proposed that staff should be responsible for being aware of their weekly schedules, while allocators should be responsible for ensuring that changes to the weekly schedules were received by staff.

    The proposal, intended to allay staff fears that they could be held responsible for failing to show up if their hours were changed without proper notification, was rejected by management.

    Another union proposal for the conditions document to state that more than 6 consecutive turns of duty "should be avoided" was also turned down by management.

  • Late Night/Early Morning Transport
    Union reps proposed three changes:
    • Trigger hours on Sunday should be 0830 and 2230.
    • Managers should have the discretion to authorise LNEMT outside the specified hours if conditions justified this.
    • LNEMT should be available to all staff, and not just those who use public transport regularly.
    Some of these suggestions may be discussed with management on the grounds that they are textual corrections, rather than alterations of substance.

  • Meals
    A union proposal that meals should be scheduled "at reasonable times" was rejected by management.

  • Extra Responsibility Reward
    Management's proposals would scrap ad hoc ERR, and would reward longer term acting (more than 3 months) through the performance pay system. The union tabled a formula, based on the existing ERR provision, for payment of ERR in future. This was rejected by management.
TREATMENT OF REDUNDANT STAFF

In response to union questions, management confirmed that:

  • Staff under notice would be able to use up all leave, including long service leave, before their last day of service. Payment of leave would be considered only if reasonable requests had been turned down.
  • Courses on "Moving on" and retirement would be on offer to redundant staff, but other training would be limited since the overall re-training budget was £500 per person leaving.
  • Reasonable time off would be allowed for job-hunting and interviews.
FAILURE TO AGREE

Management said that they could not accept any of the proposed changes in the conditions of service document, except those which were straightforward textual corrections.

They wanted to proceed with interviews and redundancy selection, and believed that the agreed procedure for negotiations had now been exhausted.

The unions said that there were still several issues which stood in the way of agreement, and formally registered a failure to agree. They also told management that there was now no alternative to an industrial action ballot, and formal notice of this would be given to the BBC in due course.

Among the points of dispute were:

  • Withdrawing from the 10s/12s working time agreements.
  • Not allowing travel claims within 15 miles of Television Centre and Manchester BH and withdrawal of ad hoc acting pay (ERR).
  • Other unagreed points of planned changes to local conditions.
  • Enforced redundancy in a number of areas, including Studio Management, Radio OBs, Studio Resource Managers and Manchester OBs, along with any related selection criteria.
  • Proposals to move Studio Engineering from UPA1 to UPA2 and the closure of Sound and Vision workshop.

Management regretted the failure to agree, and said that they had made significant concessions during the talks, in particular the reductions in planned redundancies.

They acknowledged that the new staffing arrangements and conditions of service would put additional burdens on the staff who remain, and could reduce their earnings, but the changes were necessary to achieve the savings targets that had been set.

Management also confirmed that some parts of the new conditions contradicted the national and/or directorate conditions of service, however the union side said that it would be futile to pursue this issue at a national-level meeting, even if the procedures allowed this.

The meeting ended in silence.

CONCLUSION

Despite several weeks of talks, during which a number of genuine concessions were made by management, the package of changes proved too much for the unions to swallow.

Some aspects of the new conditions of service have provoked anger among members, and the shock announcement that all staff in Studio Management were to be sacked put any agreement on redundancies out of reach.

Management have left most of their concessions on the table, in spite of the failure to agree, so many staff in London Ops can rest assured that there will be no compulsory redundancies in their category.

However, now that the negotiating procedure has been exhausted, management are certain to begin setting up interviews for new jobs, many of them closed boards at the union's request, and will also start to select compulsory redundancies, initially among Radio OB staff.

Staff in Studio Management and the Manchester OB base now face compulsory redundancy, with 5 months' notice likely to be issued at the end of October.

Although the union was willing to approve parts of the boarding process, the failure to agree effectively means that none of the steps being taken to fill jobs or identify redundancies has been accepted.

Many of the job descriptions for new posts have not been finally signed off by the union, and these, along with other issues like the number of Technical Assistants to be employed, are left in limbo.

Ballot forms for industrial action, and action short of industrial action, should be sent out to members within the next ten days. The union is not expecting any reaction from management until the ballot has closed.



Posted 20 October 2000
Amended 7 November 2000


Related pages
BBC reorganisation 2000 - home page


Top of pageTop of page

Copyright © 1997-2001 BECTU. All rights reserved.