EC consultation on modernising and improving employment relations: BECTU preliminary comments
30 August 2000
- As a union representing many thousands of freelance workers, especially in the audiovisual sector, we have a particular interest in the section on economically dependent workers.
- The vast majority of such freelances are individual workers and do not operate as small businesses. A significant number are genuinely self-employed (Schedule D) in terms of Inland Revenue criteria; others are PAYE freelances; yet others can move between Schedule D and PAYE according to the particular grade or occupation they undertake on any particular engagement.
- We strongly believe that all such freelances - including those who are Schedule D but do not operate as small businesses - deserve the same level of protection as other workers in terms of employment rights, health and safety and other relevant areas. Many Schedule D freelances work in industries - such as film and television -where the labour market is significantly or even overwhelmingly casualised. They have no option but to work on a self-employed basis and should not be penalised for doing so.
- However, we continue to find, despite the encouraging recent trend towards employment rights for 'workers' rather than just 'employees', that genuinely self-employed individual freelances often find themselves in an inferior or at best ambiguous position in terms of access to employment rights. We believe that workers with self-employed tax status should not be disadvantaged in this way.
- We hope that these concerns can be raised in the context of the consultation. We believe they are consistent with the Commission's expressed aim, in paragraph 5.1.g, that:
"the protection given to workers either by legislation or collective agreements should focus more on supporting the long-term development of the worker's career, and less on each particular employment relationship. Changes in the type of work, in the nature of the contract (employee, self-employed) or in the content of the job should affect to the least possible extent the level of protection."
- We look forward to providing more specific information if required during the further process of the consultation.
Last updated 26 September 2000